New Videos






Translation Tools Übersetzungen








Aids Controversy








What is the true definition of AIDS? What causes AIDS? Is there proof for HIV? The growing number of AIDS CRITICS point to fundamental shortcomings of the “HIV causes Aids” theory.


read here ongoing discussions about HIV-Aids in the British Medical Journals source...


read here why many critical scientists disagree with the “HIV causes AIDS” theory

critical scientific views on AIDS

Is HIV - the AIDS virus - harmless?  Is AIDS not contagious?  Are the HIV/AIDS tests worthless? Is AIDS medication killing patients? Find out what the AIDS establishment and media do not want you to know...  sourve...


Over 2,000 scientists, medical professionals, authors and academics are on record that the “Hiv-Aids” theories, routinely reported to the public as if they were facts, are dubious to say the least.   source...


Top 100 AIDS Science Inconsistencies

All of the observations below can be substantiated by independent research. How long can the HIV=AIDS=Death dogma be maintained in the face of so many scientific cracks?  source...

HIV Is Not the Cause of AIDS

Peter Duesberg in “Science” 241:514-517 July 29, 1988.
“Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is not the cause of AIDS because it fails to meet the postulates of Koch and Henle, as well as six cardinal rules of virology.”  

HIV=AIDS Controversy: Letters to the Editor

Robert Giraldo has positioned himself among those in the forefront of the battle to beat back the encroachment of the western HIV/AIDS establishment in South Africa where they are expected to do their worst damage yet to fellow human beings of this planet. This letter to the South African Journal of Medicine pulls together the myriad components of the controversy and provides extensive citations. Other equally compelling and comprehensive comments and papers can be found at Dr. Giraldo's web site, located here.  source...

Discussion / HIV Does Not Cause AIDS by  Mohammed Ali Al-Bayati

The proponents of the HIV-hypothesis must be aware of the impact of illicit drug and alcohol abuse on health. However, they choose to discount the AIDS connection. Fauci et al. (1998) stated, "a markedly higher age-specific mortality rate among injection drug users in the general population was documented even before the epidemic of infection with HIV and AIDS. For example, in New York City between 1965 and 1972, the death rate among relatively young (20 to 54-year-olds) adult heroin addicts not involved in drug-treatment programs was estimated to be five time greater than that among age-matched non-heroin-addicted adults (28.2 per 1000 versus 5.6 per 1000). A substantial portion of this excess mortality was the result of infectious complications of injection drug use". At least 25 percent of such opiate abusers are likely to die within 10 to 20 years of active abuse". The same period (10-20 years) is also given by A. Fauci and the leaders of the HIV-hypothesis as the incubation time for HIV in the drug users (Fauci et al., 1998 and Al-Bayati, 1999).

The list of health problems induced by drug and alcohol abuse and those resulting from practicing receptive anal sex that required treatment with steroid is extensive. The chronic use of high doses of steroid (40-60 mg per day for several months) can cause AIDS as described in this report. 

A growing group of scientists think the AIDS virus (HIV) is harmless and AIDS is not contagious. source...

Top 100 AIDS Science Inconsistencies

All the inconsistencies below can be substantiated by independent research.
The persistence of the HIV=AIDS=Death dogma is truly astonishing, in the face of so many specific scientific flaws.  

read here what “orthodox” aids researchers think about the “Aids Critics”

Does HIV Cause AIDS?

by Martin Delaney / Founding Director, Project Inform

Dear Friend:

In recent years, many stories have appeared in the media highlighting the views of individuals who claim that HIV is not the cause of AIDS. These articles are always “good copy” in the sense that they generate controversy and reader response. Many AIDS educators and public health officials are concerned, however, that such views, presented without context or challenge, undermine efforts to teach safer sexual behaviors needed for reducing the spread of HIV. Others fear that they may discourage people from seeking useful treatment available from their doctors and serve to confuse people about important medical matters which may affect their lives in the most profound ways.

Readers of these articles are often impressed with the arguments made. Without cross examination or knowledge of the underlying scientific questions, readers have very little basis for evaluating what they hear. In our experience, few of today’s readers have ever had the chance to examine the information which led scientists to conclude that HIV is the cause of AIDS. Indeed, the promoters of the alternative viewpoint show little awareness of this information and rely instead on their own often distorted data set. The case for the causality of HIV is largely old news which doesn’t seem to warrant column space.

Younger readers in particular, because they have never seen the real scientific arguments, are a particularly easy target for those who advocate alternative views. Unfortunately, it is also a fact that new HIV infections are growing more rapidly among young gay men and young men and women of color and are among the highest ever seen in the history of the epidemic. The message of the HIV critics is an attractive one to this audience, as it relieves them of the fear of HIV transmission. The most prominent HIV critic has often openly suggested that condom use and safe sex is a futile and unnecessary gesture. It is critical that people hear the whole story—not just the unconventional view. This is especially true for an age group which gives special value to things which carry the label “alternative.”

Dissident Scientists and Government Conspiracies:

A Look at Alternative AIDS Theories Aaron Plant, Associate Producer, HIV InSite

The majority of mainstream scientists believe that AIDS is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (16, 17, 18, 19) and that the disease was somehow introduced into the human population from one or more non-human primates. Not everyone agrees, however. Despite considerable evidence to the contrary, a small, but well-known group of scientists argues that HIV does not cause AIDS. This group, lead by UC Berkeley molecular and cell biologist Peter Duesberg, contends that AIDS is brought about by lifestyle factors such as recreational and anti-HIV drugs. Along with this dissident scientific theory, numerous non-scientific AIDS theories circulate among the general population in the United States and other countries. Many of them contend that HIV is man-made and part of a conspiracy to wipe out one or more specific groups of people. Although many would dismiss such theories as ludicrous, they are widespread and have important ramifications for the treatment and prevention of HIV.  



The HIV-AIDS Connection

The acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) was first recognized in 1981 and has since become a major worldwide pandemic . Abundant evidence indicates that AIDS is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) , which was discovered in 1983. By leading to the destruction and/or functional impairment of cells of the immune system, notably CD4+ T cells, HIV progressively destroys the body's ability to fight infections and certain cancers.
Why is there overwhelming scientific consensus that HIV causes AIDS? 

for more research go here...



keywords: aids controversy # hiv-aids discussion # aids critic(s) # peter duesberg # robert giraldo # mohammed ali al-bayati # hiv=aids=death dogma # hiv-hypothesis # postulates of koch and henle # aids virus # aids science inconsistencies # dr gallo critic(s) # azt critics # aids lawsuits # aids court case(s) # aids censorship # robert gallo critic # hiv aids censorship # aids hiv critic(s) # hiv critic(s) # dr gallo lawsuit(s) # azt toxicity # haart toxicity # interferon toxicity # dr gallo court case(s) # hiv test false positive # aids lie(s) # hep-c critic(s) # hiv-hcv critic(s) # hiv test critic(s) # aids war(s) # aids keywords # critical virology # critical virologists # aids critics keywords campaign #






welcome visitor

Abonnieren Sie den FitReport - Newsletter

anmelden abmelden


bitte unterstützt >> Aids Kritik Stichwort Kampagne please support >> Aids Critics Keywords Campaign


 | Home | Deutsch | Leber | Hepatitis | Virologie | Naturheilkunde | Selbsthilfe | Ärzte | SuchHilfe | Newsletter | Musik | DVD | Buecher ABC |

 | English | Liver | Hepatitis | Virology | int. HepLinks | Nat. Remedies | Yin-Yang | MediaReports | Encyclopaedia | Wellness | Search Help |

(c) 2001-2010 by think: FITNESS | haftungsauschluss / disclaimer | contact webmaster | please bookmark this Site | SiteMap | Impressum